Knowledge Management in Healthcare: Succeeding in Spite of Technology

Technology and healthcare always have had anIs the suggestion box readily accessible? Does the
uneasy relationship. On one hand, there is thehospital culture encourage suggestions and
promise of technology and the enhancements itincorporate them into the organization's routines?
offers healthcare. These include improved medicalIf so, this is a working and useful KM system.
information access, streamlined reporting,This is when technology can really enhance the
automation, reduced errors and more efficientsystem by extending its reach and providing a
processes. On the other hand, technology hashistorical warehouse of implementations. But,
fallen short of its full potential in healthcare, as toowhen the suggestion box isn't used appropriately,
many competing systems make integrated datathen having the latest, greatest, technologically
difficult to obtain. Additionally, the burdens of dataadvanced computer suggestion box won't
entry and analysis burdens overwhelm rather thanimprove anything. Once again, an organization
streamline processes.Healthcare faces theserequires a "learning" culture to value the
mistakes if it "applies" technology to organizationalcollaborative learning obtained through KM
Knowledge Management (KM) without firstsystems.Some organizations overcome these
identifying KM goals and understanding how a KMobstacles by using technology as a tool instead of
system will be used by administrators, physicians,as a solution. Technology can enhance knowledge
managers, and staff. Technology facilitatesexchange by providing multiple access models
knowledge exchange, but it is not the end-all to(interactive events and data warehouses) and
managing knowledge effectively. Technologywidespread distribution of new and innovative
designed to enhance the interaction among aideas. Thoughtful abstracting and archiving of
community of similar-minded participants, such asevents and documents enable managers to
healthcare employees, can greatly enhance theactively apply lessons learned by others and
exchange of knowledge. But it is the process andapplies knowledge to their daily work.Managing
culture of an organization rather than the level ofCompeting Expectations of Users and
applied technology that make a KM system aAdministratorsUnless it fills some need and is
wealth or void of retrievable information.Aneasily accessible in one's daily routine, a KM
effective KM system is built on communicationsystem will probably be ignored. Healthcare runs
and education and thrives in organizationsat a hectic pace and staff needs to spend as little
encouraging shared learning both within andtime as possible navigating a KM system to obtain
outside of the hospital walls. These systems storeuseful information. Administrators will not support
historical knowledge and knowledge created duringKM efforts unless they see demonstrated results.
exchanges of information among people who areConsider the following criteria when weighing the
interested in learning. Knowledge managementpros and cons of a KM system:· What is the
systems designed with goals in mind, versus justorganization's purpose for the KM system?·
acquiring the most advanced technology, is whatWhere is the existing knowledge?· How is the
will support healthcare organizations in streamliningknowledge transferred?· Who will have
processes, reducing costs and improving care.Whyaccess to the system?· How will access
Knowledge Management in Healthcare?Healthcareprivileges vary among staff members?· How
industry professionals are realizing that previouswill each department use the system?· How
efforts, (e.g. searching for the elusive "bestwill ideas be exchanged, in-house exclusively or
practice" and applying it as a commodity),with other organizations?· What is the
bureaucratic and toothless performancestructure of the KM system? Will it just
improvement initiatives and poorly thought-out ITcreate directories of experts or will it also create
implementations, have not led to improved resultsactive learning communities (active learning)?·
and reduced costs. As a mindset, KM attachesWhat amount of support will be required at each
importance to knowledge and identifies the valuelevel?· How user-friendly is it?It never serves
of knowledge at different levels. As a framework,an organization to design a system with all the
KM facilitates knowledge access and transfer,fancy bells and whistles, just for the sake of
which helps change behaviors and improvehaving slick features. Create a KM system
decisions. Knowledge management systemsconsistent with the way the hospital staff will use
support healthcare workers in using availableit. If the purpose is to inspire employees to think
knowledge to develop organizational learning. This'outside the box', systems can be designed to
learning assists the employees in critiquing afacilitate this. The best way to manage competing
compilation of practice ideas and successfullyexpectations is to understand it all upfront. The
designing a customized "Best Practice" for thehealthcare industry, especially, does not have the
organization. A good KM system can help staffbankroll to pay for underutilized features.Key
create and exploit new knowledge. It is capable ofComponents for A Successful KM System:1. Fulfills
driving decisions, change and improvements to allorganizational goals. A KM system structured
levels of the organization. And, in this era ofaround an organization's goals will support the
escalating costs and declining reimbursements, anefforts of employees to reach these goals. John
effective KM system is virtually essential to aAger, Team Coordinator of the Endoscopy
healthcare organization's process improvementDepartment for Sentara Healthcare Systems,
and cost reduction strategies.Hospitals can belocated in Virginia Beach, Virginia, has participated
isolated places, which make it tough to gatherin monthly teleconference calls with colleagues
'knowledge'. The clinical side has the measurablenationwide. "It is part of my hospital's goal to do
research and knows the outcomes, but thebenchmarking. This hospital is very strong on
operational side of the hospital lacks thissharing information and the previous methods
information. Consider this example. A hospital'swere not effective. Prior to the teleconference
operational staff may be well aware of thecalls, we were doing phone communication, which
increased benefit to changing one of its productswas difficult at best. Now we have set scheduled
used for patient care management. Nevertheless,times on a monthly basis and we just recently
the staff struggles when it comes topicked up using computer-based knowledge."2.
demonstrating the cost/benefit to administrationAddresses social networks. If employees feel like
and to the physicians. A KM system offers athey belong to a particular group, then they are
hospital staff access to strategies and contactsmore likely to share successes and failures with
so they can learn how others have successfullythat group. Sharing failures is especially beneficial
carried out similar situations.Can We Talk?Hospitalto a knowledge management system since people
staff is willing to share their knowledge withtend to learn more effectively when they're told
others in the field, although it's often doneshown what not to do. Develop knowledge
informally, such as networking at a convention orcommunities or communities of practice (COP's)
conversations with internal and external peers.around functional and clinical topics. Orchestrate
Effective KM systems capitalize on theseevents where staff can share experiences
opportunities.How does a KM system change(especially failures) without fear of
behaviors and improve decisions? One hospitalcensure.Collective history of a social network is
department is concerned with retaining staff,important. The background information from all
especially in light of the current nursing shortage.participants in a COP builds a shared, historical
Typically, the manager struggles with the staffingbase, which solidifies commitment to the group
issues alone or relies on a few peers within theprocess and increases exchanges. "I've really
department. Yet, what if the manager couldenjoyed the participation," says Ager. "It has really
connect with a peer internally and solicit his or herhelped me get a better picture of the field I'm in
advice, even though this employee works in anbecause I'm actually having a one-on-one
unrelated department? The insight andimmediate interaction with somebody as opposed
perspective from an "outsider" may be veryto the old process where you'd have a fixed set
useful. How about contacting peers at otherof questions you'd e-mail to them. Then, you'd try
facilities? An effective KM system would facilitateto call them to get answers or they would fax
'experience sharing' among people struggling withtheir answers back to you. It wasn't as clear and
staffing issues. It also archives the solutionsconcise. This is ongoing and I like the immediate
brainstormed from the interaction to use as aand personal response back," explains Ager.3.
basis for growing the collective knowledge of theArchives existing knowledge. Create historical
group. This information is then readily accessiblerecords by categorizing and abstracting knowledge
the next time a hospital manager (within thegleaned from interactions. Make it easy for users
hospital or from another facility) faces retentionto locate relevant learning. Ager uses his KM
issues.Another method hospitals typically use tosystem to share documentation prior to the
gain knowledge is gathering ideas from a multitudeactual teleconference with the other participants.
of experts, as is done when attending aThey use spreadsheets and data management
conference or a convention. Yet, how is thatfor references when talking on the telephone.
information disseminated throughout the hospital"I've found this aspect beneficial because as we
or healthcare organization if only two employeesare talking, I'm able to look at the information
attended the convention? If it is difficult to sharefirsthand and it spurs questions for me too," says
and build ideas within one department or evenAger. Additionally, all participants receive e-mail
throughout one hospital, how can anyone expectsummations of the teleconference (created by
cross-hospital exchanges to prove fruitful?the KM system coordinator). Call topics are based
Obviously, it is more difficult to share informationon the suggestions and questions introduced in
when individuals are not physically together andprevious teleconferences. If one facility has a
even more complex when the individuals arespecific question, the coordinator will request
employees of different healthcare organizations.examples related to this question from all
The benefits of sharing such a huge reservoir ofparticipants, summarize the information and then
knowledge are colossal. Technology is a must inforward it to all facilities.4. Facilitates "new"
these cases.Knowledge Management ≠knowledge. Knowledge comes from many
Information TechnologyEffective KM cannot besources including knowledge forums, conference
thought of, nor treated, as simply anothercalls, research articles, surveys, and opinion polls.
exercise in information technology. Unfortunately,Encourage participants to exchange ideas and
due to the access and distribution enhancementsshare experiences, challenges and successes. Most
technology provides, healthcare administratorspeople are not able to develop an action plan
often have a distorted view of a KM system assimply by reading or analyzing data. Rather, they
an information technology system or as a solutionare more inspired by talking and exchanging ideas.
that needs to be applied. While technologyAccording to Ager, "Participating in the
enhances sharing and information exchange, eventeleconference calls is one of the best ways of
the most technologically advanced KM system willsharing information that I've been exposed to in
not solve every dilemma. The keys to athe last nine years since I've been working for
successful KM implementation are:· Identifythis facility. It's given me real time data and real
the knowledge to exchange and distribute·people to talk to. Issues constantly change. At
Determine how knowledge will be managed·one point, staffing was a priority at several of the
Match technology and resources appropriately tofacilities and because we shared information, other
the culture and needs of the organizationAnotherfacilities implemented the shared ideas when it
fallacy about KM is that "knowledge" can bewas the right time for them. It's easier than
reduced to documents and then warehoused in alooking at a piece of paper with raw data on it
computer database for people to access aswondering what to do with it."Moving ForwardThe
needed. The improvement resulting from a KMexplosion of information technology and its instant
system comes from personal interaction, theaccessibility have created powerful solutions for
sharing of experiences, taking action and recordingthe healthcare business. Healthcare must invest its
the results, growing collective knowledge of aresources and technology wisely. A carefully
group and building new knowledge from theconsidered and well-resourced KM implementation
experiences of others. Technology based solelywill enable organizations to leverage data,
on warehousing knowledge "documents" or bestknowledge and experience to improve patient
practices are not successful in driving change andcare and lower healthcare costs. Why 'reinvent
improvement in the organization.It takesthese conversations' when they've already taken
resources beyond technology to manageplace countless times? KM systems designed to
knowledge effectively. Group interactions must beserve an organization's goals, and built to foster
facilitated, results must be archived andsocial interactions that encourage the exchange of
reinvested in the knowledge pool andknowledge, will assist organizations in
management actions and change must berevolutionizing healthcare.Sidebar: Keys to
supported by the organization. EffectivelyGenerating New Knowledge
managing and leveraging knowledge in anUse these ideas when designing a KM
organization cannot be abdicated to the ITsystem:· Create Communities of Practice
system.Apply Thoughtful TechnologyOrganizations(COP)· Moderate COP processes to extract
have a habit of buying the latest, greatest KMlearning· Make continuous learning
system on the market, if for no other reasonavailable· Determine how successes are
than because others have done the same. Yet,shared and how failures are communicated·
elaborate systems that aren't called for tend toAnalyze failure for future learning· Generate,
breed reluctance. Does the hospital or healthcareabstract and categorize historical knowledge
organization really need the latest and greatest?records· Provide multiple access paths for
When analyzing the implementation of a KMparticipantsShelley Burns is director of knowledge
system, first determine what is really necessarymanagement at The Healthcare Management
to meet the hospital's needs. For instance, takeCouncil Inc., a benchmarking and performance
the simple suggestion box. Are the employeesimprovement firm in Needham, MA.
making practical suggestions or snide comments?