Why PalmOS Has Faded - Moore's Outlaw

7 the concept of storing thousands of contacts,external memory, support for external devices
notes, appointments and "to do" lists on a(ex: Wi-Fi), higher screen resolutions, greater and
calculator sized device was absolutely cuttinggreater media support, e-mail, IM, web, Office
edge. If such a device could also function as aapps...until the PalmOS became a copy of
platform for applications from IndependentMicrosoft's OS, which Redmond had been steadily
Software Developers, all the better, and add theimproving for 5 years.
funky ability to share the programs, contacts, andOver those years, the table stakes for being a
appointments through infrared 'beaming' and itcompelling PDA changed. Customers wanted the
sounded like the stuff of sci-fi novels - at least ingreater features of the advanced PDAs, and
those days. And yet, this marvel is exactly whatwere no longer satisfied with the original simplicity
the PalmPilot brought to the world.of the PalmPilot. The PalmOS had to up its ante.
What made many of us enamored with theAnd a funny thing happened over those years. It
PalmOS was that, unlike the Windows OS thatwas subtle, and thus hard to notice. Like a child
most of us used on a daily basis, there was nogrowing up, you don't see it grow. And as a Palm
BSOD (Blue Screen Of Death), no crashes, littleuser, I don't know when it started...but my Palm
waiting, and little complexity. The PalmPilot did adevices started to crash. Under the weight of so
few important things, and it did them VERY well.many layers of improvements and enhancements,
The PalmPilot also introduced most of us tothe PalmOS lost its simplicity, and with it, lost its
something new: synchronization of data acrossstability. My Treo 650 crashes more than
multiple devices. With the PalmPilot, users did notWindows95 with an IRQ conflict (If you know,
need to enter data through the restrictive UI ofyou know). But my PalmOS Treo doesn't even
the handheld device, but could instead use agive me the BSOD, it just neglects my incoming
partner program on the PC to take advantage ofphone calls while it runs some endless loop.
the existing data of a user, and the keyboard andSomewhere in those years, PalmOS lost its
screen on the desktop. Information (contacts,innocence, and started playing feature catch-up
appointments, etc.) from the PC could then bewith Windows Mobile. But it turns out that
easily synched to the PDA. Information updates,Windows is better at being Windows than
new appointments and contacts received fromPalmOS.
beaming would also be synched from the PDA toLast year, Microsoft finally enabled non-volatile
the PC. For people used to "triple tapping" contactmemory for their PDA OSes, which means that
information into a cell phone, synch was fantastic.at last, when their devices crash, you don't lose all
All of these revolutionary advances in handheldyour data and need to synch to the PC to
computing launched the PalmPilot and itsrestore a backup. This was the last critical feature
unassuming OS into the minds of tech usersthat the PalmOS had over Windows Mobile. In
everywhere, and well ahead of any competitors.fact, the PalmOS is now notably less capable in
How, then, did the PalmOS stumble so badly bythat it doesn't have a multi-tasking capable
2005? Why is it destined to fade while other laterrun-time environment (it can't do any tasks in the
OSes rise? Why has Palm finally chosen to use abackground).
Windows OS on the Treo 700w? The answer isThe unfortunate thing for consumers is that
simple: the PalmOS is a buggy whip in an age ofinstead of converging towards the PalmOS's
automobiles.original stability, the market has converged
How is it a buggy whip? Well, the original valuetowards increased functionality at the cost of
proposition for the PalmOS was: do a fewstability and reliability. Now they all crash and hang.
important things well, with few bells and whistles.If you're wondering where Symbian, the Apple
Contacts, To Do, Calendar, and Text Memos. TheNewton, etc. are in this article, I just kept it to
screen? Black and white (er...green). Simple tasksPalmOS and Windows to keep it brief. Symbian is
for simple processors and memory limits. Whenalso one of the modern winners in the
Microsoft came out of the gates in 2000 withSmartphone OS market, owing to its good
PDA efforts, they tried to be too much: color,functionality and its strong relationship to phone
office documents, PDA and mini laptop formhandset vendors - but it is more widely used
factors, media, games, sound, etc. The upshotoutside North America.
was that while the PalmOS did a few things well,To conclude, when looked at in hindsight, the
the Windows CE devices did many things poorly.PalmOS was visionary, but it was an OS designed
But just because the PalmOS was well positionedand built for the hardware of the last century.
for 2000, doesn't mean it is well positioned forUnlike MSFT, which designed a complex PDA
2006. Because of Moore's law, as time passed,Smartphone OS and then waited for the
PDA hardware became more and more capable.hardware to catch up, the PalmOS has been
The Microsoft OS's abilities seemed less and lesssurpassed by the hardware, and shall become a
like foolhardy ambitions, and more and more parvestigial technology. Thanks PalmOS for the good
for the course. The PalmOS's abilities seemedtimes, and for putting the pressure on the other
passe. By 2003, Palm suddenly found itself playinghandheld OS vendors. You'll be remembered
catch up by adding color, larger memory, fasterfondly.
processors, more sound functionality, support for