Have We Gone Too Far With Driving While Talking on the Phone?

A debate needs to be had over the continuedMoreover, what was startling was that there was
use of mobile phones and other communicativeno significant difference to the level of impairment
devices when driving.when the call was 'hands free' rather than 'hand
There are strong public interest grounds forheld'.
making our roads safer, but on occasionsWhere bad driving occurs, the police will
over-zealous enforcement ('Stunned driver finedinvestigate and will seek advice from the Crown
for blowing his nose') have undermined thisProsecution Service (CPS) over appropriate
message.charges. The official line from CPS is 'The
When it comes to banning handheld mobile phonesresponses to our 2007 public consultation have
whilst driving, there does not appear to be muchshown how seriously society views the potential
opposition to this. The public has accepted that todangers of the use of mobile phones and other
drive whilst holding a handheld phone is wrong.hand-held devices, while driving. In cases where
One can rationalise this because it would involvethe driver was avoidably and dangerously
removing one hand from the steering wheel.distracted by that use, a charge of dangerous
Surely that is the whole point of why phone callsdriving will be the starting point for our charging
in the car should be hands free?decisions'.
Years ago, I was given a lift by a taxi driver whoIt is important to note that this guidance is not
only had one hand. He was driving an automaticjust for handheld phone cases. In 2008 Marvyn
car and had the steering wheel adapted so thatRichmond was jailed for four-and-a-half years for
he could turn it the full 360 degrees. He was acausing death by dangerous driving. He was using
perfectly safe driver. The act of driving requiresa hands-free telephone at the time but was so
not only the physical skill to do so (and my taxiengrossed in a conversation that he failed to
driver had that), but it also requires thenotice traffic ahead of him had come to a
appropriate level of concentration.standstill, and ploughed into the back of the queue,
It is being distracted from the task at hand thatkilling a passenger in a van.
can lead to devastating consequences. There is aDuring his summing up to the jury, the judge said
misconception amongst some members of thethe fact that Mr Richmond probably had both
public that using a hands-free phone whilst drivinghands on the wheel did not alter the fact that he
is not only 'legal' but also 'safe'.was severely distracted by talking on his
This is simply not true. The University of UtahBluetooth headset.
undertook a three year investigation into theIt is not alleged that to use a hands-free mobile
effects on drivers of talking on mobile phones.phone is per se illegal. It is not but your attention
The following headline said it all: 'Drivers on Cellmust be focused on driving, just as it should be if
Phones Are as Bad as Drunks'. Talking on theyou have the radio on or you have a Sat Nav or
phone affected 97.5% of all drivers tested.you have passengers in your vehicle.